We understand you'd like to delete your account. If you delete your account all of your information including your comments, messages, posts, and friends and followers associations will be removed from our system. Please consider the following options before clicking delete.
If you're concerned about your public identity on site you can change both your username or your display name. Your display name is the name that is publicly visible to other users. Your username is what you login with and is in your profile url. Both can be edited by going to your profile then clicking "Edit Profile."
If you still wish to completely delete your account, click the Delete Account button below. Your account will be locked, and your information will be wiped from our servers within 30 days.
It’s nearing two weeks since unions and their cohorts on the Left have thrown a nationwide fit over Scott Walker’s solution to what is ailing Wisconsin. Unions and Democrats have made Wisconsin their cause célèbre by deploying OFA astroturf, the big talking heads, as well as recruiting just about every known Grateful Dead concert attendee on their mailing lists into Wisconsin. Meanwhile, Democratic state senators (now humorously known as fleebaggers) comically continue to hold the state hostage over an issue of union power, politics and money—nothing more and nothing less.
Despite unions’ long hatred of Scott Walker, the new governor is moving to address both the symptoms of the disease and the disease itself—the public-sector union scheme that has molested Wisconsin’s taxpayers and their children by gaming the system. Unions like Wisconsin’s teachers’ union [WEAC] (which was Wisconsin’s biggest-spending lobby in 2009) have been extraordinarily adept at fixing the system through spending millions to elect politicians who, in turn, reward the unions at the expense of the taxpayers.
Now, in response to Walker’s proposals, the Left has gone overboard in their attempt to protect their stranglehold on Wisconsin taxpayers. Even though unions have made clear that their fight is not about their wages or benefits (they’ve offered concessions), they’ve made the fight all about their “right to be unionized” and the fictitious right to “collective bargaining”—which makes their cause even more despotic.
In making Madison into something reminiscent of the spectacle of the 1960s, unions, Democrats and their liberal cohorts are attempting to make the Wisconsin union battle into a civil rights battle, when it is not. In fact, the Wisconsin fight, when compared to private-sector negotiations is about: 1) the Scope of Bargaining, 2) Union “Income” Security [Right-to-Work vs. Forced Dues], 3) whether Wisconsin should be the unions’ dues collection agency [payroll deduction of dues], and 4) whether public-sector unions should be ‘recertified’ by holding elections every year.
Contrary to the Left’s hyperbole, Scott Walker’s proposals do nothing to eliminate public-sector workers’ right to association, assemblage, or to petition their government. Even pretending that it is a “rights” issue is a mistake. There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that requires a government to engage in a back and forth negotiation with a collective of workers. In a poignant piece entitled There is No Right to Collective Bargaining, Public Service Research Foundation President David Denholm summarizes the problem with the unions’ argument, stating:
A law granting public-sector unions monopoly bargaining privileges gives a union, a special interest group, two bites at the apple. First, it uses its political clout to elect public officials. Then it negotiates with the very same officials.
When you consider that between 70 and 80 percent of all local government expenditures are personnel costs, you begin to get an idea of the magnitude of the power such laws give unions.
Not only is there no right to collective bargaining in public employment, it is wrong. Collective bargaining distorts and corrupts democratic government.
Collective bargaining is a process for employer-employee relations that was designed for the private sector. This process served as the model for the development of public-sector collective bargaining without taking into account the fundamental differences between the two sectors.
As Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour explains:
“When they have collective bargaining in Wisconsin, on one side of the table there’s state employee unions or the local employee unions. On the other side of the table are politicians that they paid for the election of those politicians,” Barbour said. “Now, who represents the taxpayers in that negotiation? Well, actually, nobody.”
Even Newsweek’s Evan Thomas noted on Sunday [via Newsbusters]:
The Democrats really depend on these public employee unions in a lot of states for their support and for their political muscle, and public employee unions got a problem here. I want to distinguish between unions and public employee unions. Unions obviously are critical, but in the public sector, public employee unions have a pretty easy time getting a lot of benefits because nobody’s really pushing back all that hard.
Admittedly, Walker’s proposals are a threat to unions in several ways. As Walker’s proposals determine:
- The extent of what unions will be allowed to bargain about. Walker’s proposal limits bargaining to wages only, effectively eliminating the WEA Trust monopoly which gets its money from local school boards and runs it through a union-run insurance company.
- Whether unions can have workers fired for not paying union dues. According to its most recent financial record on file, WEAC (the teachers’ union) raked in over $25 million in 2009. Walker’s proposal makes paying union dues voluntary, as opposed to mandatory. This goes to the lifeblood of any union. If, for example, 20% of those teachers who are currently required to pay union dues as a condition of employment opt out, WEAC could lose up to $5 million a year in revenue. [It is noteworthy that, in the private-sector, the SEIU will be conducting its second strike at a Pennsylvania medical center over the issue of mandatory dues.]
- Whether the state will continue being the unions’ dues collector. Walker’s proposal eliminates’ the employers’ payroll deduction of union dues. Again, while it is commonplace for unions to negotiate payroll deduction, there is nothing anywhere (in private or public sector law) that states that it is an employers’ duty to be a union’s collection agency.
- Whether the unions will have to ‘re-certify’ every year to maintain representational status. Of all of Walker’s proposals, this seems to be one that could be considered a ‘throw away’ item in negotiations. If Walker’s other proposals get enacted, and union-represented employees feel that the union is worthless, they can initiate an election themselves every calendar under existing law [see Section 111.83(5)[h]] .
Given the ability of the unions and their co-conspirators on the Left to hijack the issue in Wisconsin over these last two weeks, there appears no way for a “win-win” compromise to be worked out. One side or the other will win. Either the unions and the Left, or taxpayers will prevail.
If the Left wins, all chances of reforming public-sector unions will be tossed aside by weak-kneed Republicans who will then be held hostage by temper-tantrum throwing Democrats (see Indiana for example). In addition, the Left has already painted the entire Republicans party with bulls eyes and has for years. Therefore, there is no reason for GOP governors like Scott Walker, Chris Christie and John Kasich to back down, which puts the Left in an untenable situation as well.
In the meantime, the disciples of Saul Alinsky will continue their prattle, attempting to convince America that the Battle of Wisconsin is something more than a fight over union power, politics and money…even though it’s not.
_________________
“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776
X-posted.
BenchCraft, LLC announced that it will debut its Concert Sequence, a new line of recliners with an integrated sound product, at High Stage Market place on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Sequence recliners element two built-in stereo speakers plus a subwoofer specially designed specially to make a full assortment of sound. It's tactile motors that will either vibrate with the sound or be utilized independently as being a massage procedure, and separate controls that make it easy for for person adjustments to be manufactured to the volume, bass/treble, and also tactile/massage element. The process, that will possess a starting price point of $699, will even include a mini audio jack so end users can connect to their many audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 players, cell phones, and so on.). To that end, Sinning mentioned that Berkline will even be introducing in find movement
bench craft company reviews
furniture its new eCoupled technologies option--a wireless charging station for electronic gadgets such as cell phones, MP3 players, and laptops. Created by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the require for power cords by designing an electromagnetic conduit mixed with an intelligent management system that perpetually monitors electrical power flow so diverse gadgets from diverse manufactures can cost at the same time. eCoupled technological know-how can be safe for digital products considering that it can provide only the quantity of electrical power
bench craft company reviews
needed to help keep a equipment at peak energy ranges, so there exists no chance of overcharging. Though the number of products compatible with this know-how is restricted, Berkline expects that a great deal more and much more brands will move toward incorporating the ability to connect to your eCoupled operate
The Bench Craft Company offers you no excuses for the really difficult do the trick and perseverance that they commit on their own to so as to preserve on their own as the leader in nationwide onsite golf program house
bench craft company reviews
marketing. No excuses for supplying their purchasers together with the most comprehensive coverage for their bench craft company reviews marketing dollar regardless if it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for furnishing golf program properties by far the most seamless plan for making further income while in the most non-intrusive manner, although enhancing the superior for the services together with the practical experience of their golfers on their residence. Bench Craft is committed to getting the perfect and also biggest at what they do, marketing on golf program bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age exactly where nobody
bench craft company reviews
wants to consider obligation for something, Bench Craft can make itself totally responsible for your accomplishment of their advertising customers, that's why their purchasers and nicely as Bench Craft constantly working experience healthy and balanced growth charges and profit margins. A firm are unable to be anymore
bench craft company reviews
triumphant than their purchaser, so it will be mission of Bench Craft for making specific that just about every client receives the most suitable plausible venue for presenting their prospects
bench craft company reviews
items and companies, no matter whether it be locally or nationally. This dedication to level of quality is what sets Bench Craft aside from its competition, and dollar for dollar tends to make its advertising goods a number of the most precious with the industry.
The golf programs bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company operates in concert with, receive providers and products and solutions at no amount. Bench Craft Company product sales crew immediately money this model for every golf course by acquiring sponsors for every item. Neighborhood vendors and players during the neighborhood get sponsorship priority and golf program management operates closely with Bench Craft to understand potential sponsors. Bench Craft’s remarkably profitable
bench craft company reviews
system provides golf programs a free of charge of charge alternate that also eliminates costs hence of design changes, course modifications, theft and vandalism.
As currently being a definite extra gain, just about every course is guarded below a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate pretty much each and every golf course. Also, Bench Craft Company works jointly with all branches for the Armed Forces, as well as state, county and city golf courses. This collection of golf courses allows for Bench Craft’s potential customers along with the most extensive coverage of golf program properties within the United states.
The ahead
bench craft company reviews
contemplating Visionaries at Bench Craft Company designed a approach that garners the interest and participation of not only its very own product sales workers, however the sponsors, golf program management plus the membership and patrons. There is just one Bench Craft Company, really do not drop for rip off plots by imposters working a rip-off.
bench craft company reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment