Washington (CNN) - Fresh on the heels of Joe Miller's surprising win over Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Alaska Republican Senate primary, the Tea Party movement is setting its sights on Delaware.
Now the Delaware Republican Party is taking heed – and taking on – the Tea Party-backed candidate in the state's Republican Senate primary, sparking a war of words between the state's establishment GOP and the Tea Party movement.
It's a race that pits conservative Tea Party favorite Christine O'Donnell against moderate Rep. Mike Castle, Delaware's former two-term governor and lone Congressman since 1993.
Both candidates' campaigns have become increasingly caustic, especially as Tea Party-backed candidates across the country have picked up win after win against GOP establishment candidates.
The Tea Party Express endorsed the conservative O'Donnell in July, and recently committed to spending at least six-figures in the state.
"We are launching an aggressive multimedia and multi-platform campaign to help propel Christine O'Donnell to victory, and we've only just begun," Amy Kremer, Chairman of the Tea Party Express, said in a statement.
The group originally planned to spend about $250,000 on the race, but is now considering expanding their presence with TV and radio ad buys in Philadelphia, said Tea Party Express political director Joe Wierzbicki.
A similar last minute media blitz by the Tea Party Express is credited with propelling Miller – a formerly little known candidate – to victory over Murkowski, the Republican Party-backed incumbent.
The group launched a series of TV and radio ads Thursday that support O'Donnell, and rail against Castle as a liberal candidate who "just keeps supporting the failed policies of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid."
It's a move that has the Castle campaign fighting back.
"Out-of-state interest groups have threatened to spend half a million dollars to fund the disgusting tactics being used by the O'Donnell campaign to make accusations," said Castle campaign manager Mike Quaranta.
Meanwhile, the Castle campaign has launched therealchristine.com, a site devoted to aggregating negative news about O'Donnell.
Tom Ross, state committee chairman of the Delaware Republican Party, defended the negative nature of the site. "The stories might not be flattering, but they are factual. ...Sometimes it is necessary to make sure that the facts get out there," Ross said.
O'Donnell has faced criticism over her personal finance issues and leftover debt from previous, unsuccessful bids for a Delaware Senate seat. She has also been accused of misstating the results of her run against Joe Biden.
When asked to clarify her remarks in an interview Thursday with radio host Dan Gaffney of WGMD, O'Donnell seemed to grow increasingly frustrated, and ultimately blamed her statements on a grueling campaign schedule.
Ross, who is backing Castle, said that O'Donnell's history is troubling.
"This is a group and candidate that clearly seem to have a problem with facts. It is shocking that they would come in and support a candidate of Christine O'Donnell's ilk," he said.
"It is sad that the group didn't investigate the candidate that they're supporting… and surprising they would take their supporters' money that they donated and squander it in such a fashion," Ross said.
Ross also questioned whether O'Donnell is capable of pulling off an upset similar to Miller's win in Alaska.
"In Alaska, it was that Joe Miller is an Ivy League grad, a war hero, excellent standing in the community," Ross said. "Look at Christine O'Donnell. She has none of those attributes. She is career politician. She's run unsuccessfully for Senate three times."
Yet, Wierzbicki criticized Ross for dismissing O'Donnell, calling her a true conservative.
" is everything that is wrong with the establishment of the Republican Party. He should be fired for serving to undermine a Republican candidate who stands on conservative principles. It's his job to advance all Republicans in the state of Delaware. Instead he has become a tool for those who wish to thwart the Republican Party platform and turn the GOP into a Democrat-lite outfit. We find him reprehensible and shameless," Wierzbicki said.
Republican Gov. Chris Christie of neighboring New Jersey endorsed Castle Thursday.
The winner will face Democrat Chris Coons in the race for Vice President Joe Biden's former seat.
If you walked into the average bookstore, you'd think that women rule the roost when it comes to personal finance. From Suze Orman's now-classic Women and Money to the more recent (and more colorfully titled) Bitches on a Budget, there's no shortage of do-it-yourself financial advice tailored to women.
Apparently, though, when women make the momentous move from self-help to seeking professional advice about investing and retirement, things go rapidly downhill. A recent study by the Boston Consulting Group revealed that women perceived themselves as receiving wealth management services at a level of quality that is inferior to that received by their male counterparts.
According to the study, women are the key decision-makers when it comes to 27% of the wealth worldwide: that's $20 trillion! But despite the massive chunk of power they wield, 55% of the women surveyed in the study said they felt their wealth manager could do a better job of advising them. Almost a quarter of the respondents said private banks needed "significant improvement" in the services they offer to women.
"The dissatisfaction stems from the unshakable perception that men get more attention, better advice, and sometimes even better terms and deals," according to study co-author Peter Damisch. "We heard this sense of subordination time and time again in our interviews."
This perceived disparity in service arose from several key disconnects in the relationships and communications between women and their financial advisers. Manisha Thakor, Chartered Financial Analyst and women's financial literacy advocate, offers some steps savvy female investors can take to avoid being under-served by their wealth managers and investment advisers:
1. Find your adviser and get your financial education from women-run resources.
The financial services industry is dominated by males and therefore the "DNA is structured around the male experience," Thakor explains, adding that she sees many firms making an effort to change this. Most financial advisers are men, who may not inherently understand the whole-life nature of the average woman's financial plans and needs. They also may have very different communication styles than their women clients.
Thakor recommends women use women-created resources like LearnVest and DailyWorth to educate themselves in order to avoid the intimidation factor when talking about investment products with their advisers. She also encourages women to consult Garrett Planning Network, founded by Certified Financial Planner Sheryl Garrett, to locate a local certified financial planner who works on an hourly-fee-only basis. Taking these steps, Thakor explains, may alleviate the concern expressed by many women in the BCG study that they were not being taken seriously or talked to on the same level as male clients by their financial advisers.
2. Expressly state your ideal career trajectory, then ask how you should alter your investment plans accordingly.
In the BCG study, women stated that their investment advisers fundamentally misunderstood what was actually important to them, and recommended a too-narrow range of inappropriate investment vehicles as a result. Many said their advisers assumed they had a lower risk tolerance than they actually did, or that their advisers focused on short-term results and disregarded their long-term goals, which often included time out to care for a child or parent.
Thakor offers women a script of sorts to remedy this communication disconnect. "Go in and say: "I want to be a mom and I may take X amount of time out of the work force," she advises. Then ask, "How do we adjust how much I need to save and how I should invest to compensate for this?"
3. Start saving early.
infertility big white booty
Artnet <b>News</b>: Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami <b>...</b>
ARTNET NEWS. Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami Sculpture Biennial, Prospect 1.5 New Orleans, more.
Diane Sawyer: ABC World <b>News</b> Goes Home: Looking for What Works in <b>...</b>
We at ABC's World News are heading out to search for innovative ideas that are helping turn the economy around. Real change is often born out of a simple act. And one ripple can lead to a powerful transformation.
BREAKING <b>NEWS</b>: Lindsay Lohan Ordered Back To Jail; Bail Revoked <b>...</b>
Lindsay Lohan is going back to jail. In a stunning move, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden Fox threw the book at Lohan Friday morning in Beverly Hills, revoking her bail and ordering her back to jail. PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan Arrives ...
Artnet <b>News</b>: Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami <b>...</b>
ARTNET NEWS. Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami Sculpture Biennial, Prospect 1.5 New Orleans, more.
Diane Sawyer: ABC World <b>News</b> Goes Home: Looking for What Works in <b>...</b>
We at ABC's World News are heading out to search for innovative ideas that are helping turn the economy around. Real change is often born out of a simple act. And one ripple can lead to a powerful transformation.
BREAKING <b>NEWS</b>: Lindsay Lohan Ordered Back To Jail; Bail Revoked <b>...</b>
Lindsay Lohan is going back to jail. In a stunning move, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden Fox threw the book at Lohan Friday morning in Beverly Hills, revoking her bail and ordering her back to jail. PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan Arrives ...
big white booty
Artnet <b>News</b>: Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami <b>...</b>
ARTNET NEWS. Gang assaults Turkish galleries. Plus, Miami Sculpture Biennial, Prospect 1.5 New Orleans, more.
Diane Sawyer: ABC World <b>News</b> Goes Home: Looking for What Works in <b>...</b>
We at ABC's World News are heading out to search for innovative ideas that are helping turn the economy around. Real change is often born out of a simple act. And one ripple can lead to a powerful transformation.
BREAKING <b>NEWS</b>: Lindsay Lohan Ordered Back To Jail; Bail Revoked <b>...</b>
Lindsay Lohan is going back to jail. In a stunning move, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden Fox threw the book at Lohan Friday morning in Beverly Hills, revoking her bail and ordering her back to jail. PHOTOS: Lindsay Lohan Arrives ...
SON says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm
DAD I AM HOMOSEX.
DAD says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm
SON I AM DISAPPOINT.
Rob Mac says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:53 pm
Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt. This would reassure people who get freaked out at the size of the debt and would have the same inflationary effect of handing the money out to American citizens. The stimulative effect would likely be a bit less, but I’d take that tradeoff.
JR says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:54 pm
Aren’t you missing the role of international trade. What you say makes sense if all goods and services are produced locally. Once you take intl. trade into account, more/printed money could simply go into buying more from other countries, who could theoretically hold that money for an indefinite time.
chris says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:56 pm
It’s true that at some point the money-printing would spark high inflation.
Yes — specifically, after aggregate demand was boosted to the point that it exceeded aggregate supply. We’re nowhere near that point — I think literally trillions of dollars short of it — so there’s plenty of room to play around with helicopter drops. Please do, Mr. Bernanke.
timmie says:
September 9th, 2010 at 4:59 pm
Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No. What evidence is there that things would be any different now? None.
The Great Reckoning that we are now experiencing was, as your cite points out, only postponed through half a decade of public and private debt increasing by 10% a year and when that became unsustainable our financial system cratered.
Does anyone think we can return to those levels of profligacy for five years or more? Does anyone doubt that even that level of new debt would prove inadequate to cure what ails us?
Our recent history has been one huge Keynesian experiment gone wrong. But to put out the fire in the dining room Matt wants to burn down the house.
chris says:
September 9th, 2010 at 5:29 pm
Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No.
No, it only halted a once-in-a-century level of economic collapse in its tracks.
But I guess since the first gallon of water didn’t put the fire out, it’s time to abandon that plan and switch to gasoline.
Ape Man says:
September 9th, 2010 at 8:32 pm
“Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt.”
This is incorrect. If you think it through, it will help you understand how money works on the macro scale.
A treasury note is an account at the Fed that bears interest. It has a fixed, often very short, term of maturity.
If you “print money” to “retire” that debt, all you are doing is changing those interest-bearing Fed accounts into non interest-bearing Fed accounts. The people who held those dollars want to hold them as Treasury notes. They will immediately reinvest them in… Treasury notes.
3
zyxw says:
September 9th, 2010 at 8:50 pm
Another structural problem now is income inequality. If income was spread out more fairly there would be a lot more money spent generating more jobs, etc. There’s only so much the super rich can spend–after awhile you really can’t buy that much more stuff, so instead they are hoarding it at the moment waiting for the economy to rebound so they can eventually invest in something and make even more money to hoard.
Shooter242 says:
September 9th, 2010 at 10:33 pm
* You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.
* As for throwing everybody a grand, it didn’t work with Bush’s $600 because you and everyone else knows it’s a one-off.
* Then there is the payroll credit for about the same amount of money, how did that work out?
Do you think our problem could be related to Congress serving up legislative pigs in a poke? For all it’s wonderfulness, health insurance in Massachusetts has led to Mass Gen Hospital
to barring new primary care patients. Now imagine that over an entire country. Any chance that would lead to more saving and less spending?
As for income inequality, Al Gore making millions has no effect on anyone that he doesn’t employ. Interestingly, the US is pretty far down on the property rights ladder globally. Apparently we are behind China, Gambia, and Jordan. Having yahoos here threaten to confiscate wealth by hook or crook, isn’t reassuring.
BB says:
September 9th, 2010 at 11:23 pm
So, why do we even keep track of the deficit? I accept the fact that we have a sovereign currency, not on a gold standard, etc., which means that we don’t have to go in debt (i.e. sell bonds) for every dollar we print/create. Thus taxation is merely an anti-inflationary measure. So…shouldn’t we just keep track of inflation and adjust our federal spending accordingly, since the deficit doesn’t actually mean anything?
urgs says:
September 10th, 2010 at 2:23 am
Defraud small savers (thats allright, since so many of them are foreigners nowadays – evil Chinese, many of them living from less than 1$ a day), shovel some windfall gains to big business ===> ?????????? =====> Jobs!
aelkejeellekeleljklejlelje
Evil Twin says:
September 10th, 2010 at 2:35 am
You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.
And here we see the return of the invisible bear riding phantom bond vigilantes. Yes, the modifiers are a bit unclear. That’s because Shooter is a fucking moron whose knowledge of financial matters is roughly the same as a four month old.
Hey, dumbfuck, do you know what you do when people don’t want to borrow money from you? You raise the stakes, you promise them more in return for loaning you the money. Do you know what interest rates look like right this moment you dimwitted clod?
Come back when you have something to say that isn’t discredited talking points.
Lewis says:
September 10th, 2010 at 7:45 pm
At the risk of confirming Matt’s views, I think Prof Keen explains it well : http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2010/09/05/back-to-the-future/
Superior Excellence Better Flavor-Organic Kona Coffee | Toilet Safety Rail says:
September 11th, 2010 at 5:50 am
Matthew Yglesias » Mo’ Money, Mo’ Demand